This manual describes (part of) the history of GNU Automake, a program that creates GNU standards-compliant Makefiles from template files.
Copyright © 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover texts, and with no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License.”
--- The Detailed Node Listing ---
Evolution of Automatic Dependency Tracking
Techniques for Computing Dependencies
Copying This Manual
The first version of the automake script looks as follows.
#!/bin/sh
status=0
for makefile
do
if test ! -f ${makefile}.am; then
echo "automake: ${makefile}.am: No such honkin' file"
status=1
continue
fi
exec 4> ${makefile}.in
done
From this you can already see that Automake will be about reading *.am file and producing *.in files. You cannot see anything else, but if you also know that David is the one who created Autoconf two years before you can guess the rest.
Several commits follow, and by the end of the day Automake is reported to work for GNU fileutils and GNU m4.
The modus operandi is the one that is still used today: variable assignments in Makefile.am files trigger injections of precanned Makefile fragments into the generated Makefile.in. The use of Makefile fragments was inspired by the 4.4BSD make and include files, however Automake aims to be portable and to conform to the GNU standards for Makefile variables and targets.
At this point, the most recent release of Autoconf is version 1.11,
and David is preparing to release Autoconf 2.0 in late October. As a
matter of fact, he will barely touch Automake after September.
I wrote it keeping in mind the possibility of it becoming an Autoconf macro, so it would run at configure-time. That would slow configuration down a bit, but allow users to modify the Makefile.am without needing to fetch the AutoMake package. And, the Makefile.in files wouldn't need to be distributed. But all of AutoMake would. So I might reimplement AutoMake in Perl, m4, or some other more appropriate language.
Automake is described as “an experimental Makefile generator”. There is no documentation. Adventurous users are referred to the examples and patches needed to use Automake with GNU m4 1.3, fileutils 3.9, time 1.6, and development versions of find and indent.
These examples seem to have been lost. However at the time of writing
(10 years later in September, 2004) the FSF still distributes a
package that uses this version of Automake: check out GNU termutils
2.0.
Tom didn't talk to djm about it until later, just to make sure he didn't mind if he made a release. He did a bunch of early releases to the Gnits folks.
Gnits was (and still is) totally informal, just a few GNU friends who
François Pinard knew, who were all interested in making a common
infrastructure for GNU projects, and shared a similar outlook on how
to do it. So they were able to make some progress. It came along
with Autoconf and extensions thereof, and then Automake from David and
Tom (who were both gnitsians). One of their ideas was to write a
document paralleling the GNU standards, that was more strict in some
ways and more detailed. They never finished the GNITS standards, but
the ideas mostly made their way into Automake.
At this time aclocal and AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE did not
exist, so many things had to be done by hand. For instance, here is
what a configure.in (this is the former name of the
configure.ac we use today) must contain in order to use
Automake 0.20:
PACKAGE=cpio
VERSION=2.3.911
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(PACKAGE, "$PACKAGE")
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(VERSION, "$VERSION")
AC_SUBST(PACKAGE)
AC_SUBST(VERSION)
AC_ARG_PROGRAM
AC_PROG_INSTALL
(Today all of the above is achieved by AC_INIT and
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.)
Here is how programs are specified in Makefile.am:
PROGRAMS = hello
hello_SOURCES = hello.c
This looks pretty much like what we do today, except the
PROGRAMS variable has no directory prefix specifying where
hello should be installed: all programs are installed in
‘$(bindir)’. LIBPROGRAMS can be used to specify programs
that must be built but not installed (it is called
noinst_PROGRAMS nowadays).
Programs can be built conditionally using AC_SUBSTitutions:
PROGRAMS = @progs@
AM_PROGRAMS = foo bar baz
(AM_PROGRAMS has since then been renamed to
EXTRA_PROGRAMS.)
Similarly scripts, static libraries, and data can be built and installed
using the LIBRARIES, SCRIPTS, and DATA variables.
However LIBRARIES were treated a bit specially in that Automake
did automatically supply the lib and .a prefixes.
Therefore to build libcpio.a, one had to write
LIBRARIES = cpio
cpio_SOURCES = ...
Extra files to distribute must be listed in DIST_OTHER (the
ancestor of EXTRA_DIST). Also extra directories that are to be
distributed should appear in DIST_SUBDIRS, but the manual
describes this as a temporary ugly hack (today extra directories should
also be listed in EXTRA_DIST, and DIST_SUBDIRS is used
for another purpose, see Conditional Subdirectories).
If you never used Perl 4, imagine Perl 5 without objects, without
‘my’ variables (only dynamically scoped ‘local’ variables),
without function prototypes, with function calls that needs to be
prefixed with ‘&’, etc. Traces of this old style can still be
found in today's automake.
bin_PROGRAMS instead of PROGRAMS,
noinst_LIBRARIES instead of LIBLIBRARIES, etc. (However
EXTRA_PROGRAMS does not exist yet, AM_PROGRAMS is still
in use; and TEXINFOS and MANS still have no directory
prefixes.) Adding support for prefixes like that was one of the major
ideas in automake; it has lasted pretty well.
AutoMake is renamed to Automake (Tom seems to recall it was François Pinard's doing).
0.25 fixes a Perl 4 portability bug.
Gordon Matzigkeit and Jim Meyering are two other early contributors that have been sending fixes.
0.27 fixes yet another Perl 4 portability bug.
LIBOBJS
support. This is an important step because until this version
Automake only knew about the Makefile.ams it processed.
configure.in was Autoconf's world and the link between Autoconf
and Automake had to be done by the Makefile.am author. For
instance, if config.h was generated by configure, it was the
package maintainer's responsibility to define the CONFIG_HEADER
variable in each Makefile.am.
Succeeding releases will rely more and more on scanning configure.in to better automate the Autoconf integration.
0.28 also introduces the AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS variable and the
--gnu and --gnits options, the latter being stricter.
CONFIG_HEADER is gone,
and rebuild rules for configure-generated file are
automatically output.
TEXINFOS and MANS converted to the uniform naming
scheme.
EXTRA_PROGRAMS finally replaces AM_PROGRAMS.
All the third-party Autoconf macros, written mostly by François
Pinard (and later Jim Meyering), are distributed in Automake's
hand-written aclocal.m4 file. Package maintainers are expected
to extract the necessary macros from this file. (In previous versions
you had to copy and paste them from the manual...)
check-local rule. Upon
Ulrich Drepper's suggestion, 0.31 makes it an Automake rule output
whenever the TESTS variable is defined.
DIST_OTHER is renamed to EXTRA_DIST, and the check_
prefix is introduced. The syntax is now the same as today.
-hook targets are introduced; an idea from Dieter Baron.
*.info files, which were output in the build directory are
now built in the source directory, because they are distributed. It
seems these files like to move back and forth as that will happen
again in future versions.
Although they were very basic at this point, these are probably among the top features for Automake today.
Jim Meyering also provides the infamous jm_MAINTAINER_MODE, since
then renamed to AM_MAINTAINER_MODE and abandoned by its author
(see maintainer-mode).
From now on and until version 1.4, new releases will occur at a rate
of about one a year. 1.1 did not exist, actually 1.1b to 1.1p have
been the name of beta releases for 1.2. This is the first time
Automake uses suffix letters to designate beta releases, a habit that
lasts.
I've created the "automake" mailing list. It is
"[email protected]". Administrivia, as always, to
[email protected].
The charter of this list is discussion of automake, autoconf, and
other configuration/portability tools (e.g., libtool). It is expected
that discussion will range from pleas for help all the way up to
patches.
This list is archived on the FSF machines. Offhand I don't know if
you can get the archive without an account there.
This list is open to anybody who wants to join. Tell all your
friends!
-- Tom Tromey
Before that people were discussing Automake privately, on the Gnits
mailing list (which is not public either), and less frequently on
gnu.misc.discuss.
gnu.ai.mit.edu is now gnu.org, in case you never
noticed. The archives of the early years of the
[email protected] list have been lost, so today it is almost
impossible to find traces of discussions that occurred before 1999.
This has been annoying more than once, as such discussions can be
useful to understand the rationale behind a piece of uncommented code
that was introduced back then.
The 1.2 release contains 20 macros, including the
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE macro that simplifies the creation of
configure.in.
Libtool is fully supported using *_LTLIBRARIES.
The missing script is introduced by François Pinard; it is meant
to be a better solution than AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
(see maintainer-mode).
Conditionals support was implemented by Ian Lance Taylor. At the time, Tom and Ian were working on an internal project at Cygnus. They were using ILU, which is pretty similar to CORBA. They wanted to integrate ILU into their build, which was all configure-based, and Ian thought that adding conditionals to automake was simpler than doing all the work in configure (which was the standard at the time). So this was actually funded by Cygnus.
This very useful but tricky feature will take a lot of time to stabilize. (At the time this text is written, there are still primaries that have not been updated to support conditional definitions in Automake 1.9.)
The automake script has almost doubled: 6089 lines of Perl,
plus 1294 lines of Makefile fragments.
Perl 5.004_04 is out, but fixes to support Perl 4 are still
regularly submitted whenever Automake breaks it.
sourceware.cygnus.com is on-line.sourceware.cygnus.comsourceware.cygnus.com announces it hosts Automake:sourceware.cygnus.com. It has a
publicly accessible CVS repository. This CVS repository is a copy of
the one Tom was using on his machine, which in turn is based on
a copy of the CVS repository of David MacKenzie. This is why we still
have to full source history. (Automake was on Sourceware until 2007-10-29,
when it moved to a git repository on savannah.gnu.org,
but the Sourceware host had been renamed to sources.redhat.com.)
The oldest file in the administrative directory of the CVS repository that was created on Sourceware is dated 1998-09-19, while the announcement that automake and autoconf had joined sourceware was made on 1998-10-26. They were among the first projects to be hosted there.
The heedful reader will have noticed Automake was exactly 4 years old
on 1998-09-19.
include
statement. Also, ‘+=’ assignments are introduced, but it is
still quite easy to fool Automake when mixing this with conditionals.
These two releases, Automake 1.4 and Autoconf 2.13 make a duo that will be used together for years.
automake is 7228 lines, plus 1591 lines of Makefile
fragment, 20 macros (some 1.3 macros were finally contributed back to
Autoconf), 197 test cases, and 51 pages of documentation.
user-dep-branch is created on the CVS repository.See Dependency Tracking Evolution, for more details about the
evolution of automatic dependency tracking in Automake.
user-dep-branch is merged into the main trunk.I think the next release should be called "3.0".
Let's face it: you've basically rewritten autoconf.
Every weekend there are 30 new patches.
I don't see how we could call this "2.15" with a straight face.
– Tom Tromey on [email protected]
Actually Akim works like a submarine: he will pile up patches while he
works off-line during the weekend, and flush them in batch when he
resurfaces on Monday.
Aiieeee! I was dreading the day that the Demaillator turned his sights on automake... and now it has arrived! – Tom Tromey
It's only the beginning: in two months he will send 192 patches. Then he would slow down so Tom can catch up and review all this. Initially Tom actually read all these patches, then he probably trustingly answered OK to most of them, and finally gave up and let Akim apply whatever he wanted. There was no way to keep up with that patch rate.
Anyway the patch below won't apply since it predates Akim's sourcequake; I have yet to figure where the relevant passage has been moved :) – Alexandre Duret-Lutz
All these patches were sent to and discussed on [email protected], so subscribed users were literally drowning in technical mails. Eventually, the [email protected] mailing list was created in May.
Year after year, Automake had drifted away from its initial design: construct Makefile.in by assembling various Makefile fragments. In 1.4, lots of Makefile rules are being emitted at various places in the automake script itself; this does not help ensuring a consistent treatment of these rules (for instance making sure that user-defined rules override Automake's own rules). One of Akim's goal was moving all these hard-coded rules to separate Makefile fragments, so the logic could be centralized in a Makefile fragment processor.
Another significant contribution of Akim is the interface with the
“trace” feature of Autoconf. The way to scan configure.in at
this time was to read the file and grep the various macro of interest
to Automake. Doing so could break in many unexpected ways; automake
could miss some definition (for instance ‘AC_SUBST([$1], [$2])’
where the arguments are known only when M4 is run), or conversely it
could detect some macro that was not expanded (because it is called
conditionally). In the CVS version of Autoconf, Akim had implemented
the --trace option, which provides accurate information about
where macros are actually called and with what arguments. Akim will
equip Automake with a second configure.in scanner that uses
this --trace interface. Since it was not sensible to drop the
Autoconf 2.13 compatibility yet, this experimental scanner was only
used when an environment variable was set, the traditional
grep-scanner being still the default.
The main purpose of this release is to have a stable automake which is compatible with the latest stable libtool.
The release also contains obvious fixes for bugs in Automake 1.4,
some of which were reported almost monthly.
AC_OUTPUTing files.
dist_, nodist_, and nobase_
prefixes.
1.5 did break several packages that worked with 1.4. Enough so that Linux distributions could not easily install the new Automake version without breaking many of the packages for which they had to run automake.
Some of these breakages were effectively bugs that would eventually be fixed in the next release. However, a lot of damage was caused by some changes made deliberately to render Automake stricter on some setup we did consider bogus. For instance, ‘make distcheck’ was improved to check that ‘make uninstall’ did remove all the files ‘make install’ installed, that ‘make distclean’ did not omit some file, and that a VPATH build would work even if the source directory was read-only. Similarly, Automake now rejects multiple definitions of the same variable (because that would mix very badly with conditionals), and ‘+=’ assignments with no previous definition. Because these changes all occurred suddenly after 1.4 had been established for more than two years, it hurt users.
To make matter worse, meanwhile Autoconf (now at version 2.52) was
facing similar troubles, for similar reasons.
The idea was to call this version automake-1.6, call all its bug-fix versions identically, and switch to automake-1.7 for the next release that adds new features or changes some rules. This scheme implies maintaining a bug-fix branch in addition to the development trunk, which means more work from the maintainer, but providing regular bug-fix releases proved to be really worthwhile.
Like 1.5, 1.6 also introduced a bunch of incompatibilities, intentional or not. Perhaps the more annoying was the dependence on the newly released Autoconf 2.53. Autoconf seemed to have stabilized enough since its explosive 2.50 release and included changes required to fix some bugs in Automake. In order to upgrade to Automake 1.6, people now had to upgrade Autoconf too; for some packages it was no picnic.
While versioned installation helped people to upgrade, it also
unfortunately allowed people not to upgrade. At the time of writing,
some Linux distributions are shipping packages for Automake 1.4, 1.5,
1.6, 1.7, 1.8, and 1.9. Most of these still install 1.4 by default.
Some distribution also call 1.4 the “stable” version, and present
“1.9” as the development version; this does not really makes sense
since 1.9 is way more solid than 1.4. All this does not help the
newcomer.
Alexandre has been using Automake since 2000, and started to
contribute mostly on Akim's incitement (Akim and Alexandre have been
working in the same room from 1999 to 2002). In 2001 and 2002 he had
a lot of free time to enjoy hacking Automake.
Tom Tromey backported the versioned installation mechanism on the 1.4
branch, so that Automake 1.6.x and Automake 1.4-p6 could be installed
side by side. Another request from the GNOME folks.
Marshall, one of the characters, is working on a computer virus that he
has to modify before it gets into the wrong hands or something like
that. The screenshots you see do not show any program code, they show
a Makefile.in generated by automake...
aclocal now uses m4_include in the produced
aclocal.m4 when the included macros are already distributed
with the package (an idiom used in many packages), which reduces code
duplication. Many people liked that, but in fact this change was
really introduced to fix a bug in rebuild rules: Makefile.in
must be rebuilt whenever a dependency of configure changes, but
all the m4 files included in aclocal.m4 where unknown
from automake. Now automake can just trace the
m4_includes to discover the dependencies.
aclocal also starts using the --trace Autoconf option
in order to discover used macros more accurately. This will turn out
to be very tricky (later releases will improve this) as people had
devised many ways to cope with the limitation of previous
aclocal versions, notably using handwritten
m4_includes: aclocal must make sure not to redefine a
rule that is already included by such statement.
Automake also has seen its guts rewritten. Although this rewriting took a lot of efforts, it is only apparent to the users in that some constructions previously disallowed by the implementation now work nicely. Conditionals, Locations, Variable and Rule definitions, Options: these items on which Automake works have been rewritten as separate Perl modules, and documented.
Aside from this it contains mainly minor changes and bug-fixes.
savannah.gnu.orgOver the years Automake has deployed three different dependency tracking methods. Each method, including the current one, has had flaws of various sorts. Here we lay out the different dependency tracking methods, their flaws, and their fixes. We conclude with recommendations for tool writers, and by indicating future directions for dependency tracking work in Automake.
Our first attempt at automatic dependency tracking was based on the method recommended by GNU make. (see Generating Prerequisites Automatically)
This version worked by precomputing dependencies ahead of time. For each source file, it had a special .P file that held the dependencies. There was a rule to generate a .P file by invoking the compiler appropriately. All such .P files were included by the Makefile, thus implicitly becoming dependencies of Makefile.
This approach had several critical bugs.
The code generated by Automake is often inspired by the Makefile style of a particular author. In the case of the first implementation of dependency tracking, I believe the impetus and inspiration was Jim Meyering. (I could be mistaken. If you know otherwise feel free to correct me.)
The next refinement of Automake's automatic dependency tracking scheme was to implement dependencies as side effects of the compilation. This was aimed at solving the most commonly reported problems with the first approach. In particular we were most concerned with eliminating the weird rebuilding effect associated with make clean.
In this approach, the .P files were included using the
-include command, which let us create these files lazily. This
avoided the ‘make clean’ problem.
We only computed dependencies when a file was actually compiled. This avoided the performance penalty associated with scanning each file twice. It also let us avoid the other problems associated with the first, eager, implementation. For instance, dependencies would never be generated for a source file that was not compilable on a given architecture (because it in fact would never be compiled).
maude.o: maude.c something.h
Now suppose that you remove something.h and update maude.c so that this include is no longer needed. If you run make, you will get an error because there is no way to create something.h.
We fixed this problem in a later release by further massaging the output of gcc to include a dummy dependency for each header file.
The bugs associated with ‘make dist’, over time, became a real problem. Packages using Automake were being built on a large number of platforms, and were becoming increasingly complex. Broken dependencies were distributed in “portable” Makefile.ins, leading to user complaints. Also, the requirement for gcc and GNU make was a constant source of bug reports. The next implementation of dependency tracking aimed to remove these problems.
We realized that the only truly reliable way to automatically track dependencies was to do it when the package itself was built. This meant discovering a method portable to any version of make and any compiler. Also, we wanted to preserve what we saw as the best point of the second implementation: dependency computation as a side effect of compilation.
In the end we found that most modern make implementations support some form of include directive. Also, we wrote a wrapper script that let us abstract away differences between dependency tracking methods for compilers. For instance, some compilers cannot generate dependencies as a side effect of compilation. In this case we simply have the script run the compiler twice. Currently our wrapper script (depcomp) knows about twelve different compilers (including a "compiler" that simply invokes makedepend and then the real compiler, which is assumed to be a standard Unix-like C compiler with no way to do dependency tracking).
This bug occurs because dependency tracking tools, such as the compiler, only generate dependencies on the successful opening of a file, and not on every probe.
Suppose for instance that the compiler searches three directories for a given header, and that the header is found in the third directory. If the programmer erroneously adds a header file with the same name to the first directory, then a clean rebuild from scratch could fail (suppose the new header file is buggy), whereas an incremental rebuild will succeed.
What has happened here is that people have a misunderstanding of what a dependency is. Tool writers think a dependency encodes information about which files were read by the compiler. However, a dependency must actually encode information about what the compiler tried to do.
This problem is not serious in practice. Programmers typically do not use the same name for a header file twice in a given project. (At least, not in C or C++. This problem may be more troublesome in Java.) This problem is easy to fix, by modifying dependency generators to record every probe, instead of every successful open.
This was also a problem in the previous dependency tracking implementation.
The current fix is to use BUILT_SOURCES to list built headers
(see Sources). This causes them
to be built before any other build rules are run. This is unsatisfactory
as a general solution, however in practice it seems sufficient for most
actual programs.
This code is used since Automake 1.5.
In GCC 3.0, we managed to convince the maintainers to add special command-line options to help Automake more efficiently do its job. We hoped this would let us avoid the use of a wrapper script when Automake's automatic dependency tracking was used with gcc.
Unfortunately, this code doesn't quite do what we want. In particular, it removes the dependency file if the compilation fails; we'd prefer that it instead only touch the file in any way if the compilation succeeds.
Nevertheless, since Automake 1.7, when a recent gcc is detected at configure time, we inline the dependency-generation code and do not use the depcomp wrapper script. This makes compilations faster for those using this compiler (probably our primary user base). The counterpart is that because we have to encode two compilation rules in Makefile (with or without depcomp), the produced Makefiles are larger.
There are actually several ways for a build tool like Automake to cause tools to generate dependencies.
LD_PRELOADopen and other syscalls. This technique is also quite
powerful, but unfortunately it is not portable enough for use in
automake.
We think that every compilation tool ought to be able to generate dependencies as a side effect of compilation. Furthermore, at least while make-based tools are nearly universally in use (at least in the free software community), the tool itself should generate dummy dependencies for header files, to avoid the deleted header file bug. Finally, the tool should generate a dependency for each probe, instead of each successful file open, in order to avoid the duplicated new header bug.
Currently, only languages and compilers understood by Automake can have dependency tracking enabled. We would like to see if it is practical (and worthwhile) to let this support be extended by the user to languages unknown to Automake.
The following table (inspired by ‘perlhist(1)’) quantifies the evolution of Automake using these metrics:
| Date | Rel | am | acl | pm | *.am | m4 | doc | t
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1994-09-19 | CVS | 141 | 299 (24) |
| ||||
| 1994-11-05 | CVS | 208 | 332 (28) |
| ||||
| 1995-11-23 | 0.20 | 533 | 458 (35) | 9 |
| |||
| 1995-11-26 | 0.21 | 613 | 480 (36) | 11 |
| |||
| 1995-11-28 | 0.22 | 1116 | 539 (38) | 12 |
| |||
| 1995-11-29 | 0.23 | 1240 | 541 (38) | 12 |
| |||
| 1995-12-08 | 0.24 | 1462 | 504 (33) | 14 |
| |||
| 1995-12-10 | 0.25 | 1513 | 511 (37) | 15 |
| |||
| 1996-01-03 | 0.26 | 1706 | 438 (36) | 16 |
| |||
| 1996-01-03 | 0.27 | 1706 | 438 (36) | 16 |
| |||
| 1996-01-13 | 0.28 | 1964 | 934 (33) | 16 |
| |||
| 1996-02-07 | 0.29 | 2299 | 936 (33) | 17 |
| |||
| 1996-02-24 | 0.30 | 2544 | 919 (32) | 85 (1) | 20 | 9
| ||
| 1996-03-11 | 0.31 | 2877 | 919 (32) | 85 (1) | 29 | 17
| ||
| 1996-04-27 | 0.32 | 3058 | 921 (31) | 85 (1) | 30 | 26
| ||
| 1996-05-18 | 0.33 | 3110 | 926 (31) | 105 (1) | 30 | 35
| ||
| 1996-05-28 | 1.0 | 3134 | 973 (32) | 105 (1) | 30 | 38
| ||
| 1997-06-22 | 1.2 | 6089 | 385 | 1294 (36) | 592 (20) | 37 | 126
| |
| 1998-04-05 | 1.3 | 6415 | 422 | 1470 (39) | 741 (23) | 39 | 156
| |
| 1999-01-14 | 1.4 | 7240 | 426 | 1591 (40) | 734 (20) | 51 | 197
| |
| 2001-05-08 | 1.4-p1 | 7251 | 426 | 1591 (40) | 734 (20) | 51 | 197
| |
| 2001-05-24 | 1.4-p2 | 7268 | 439 | 1591 (40) | 734 (20) | 49 | 197
| |
| 2001-06-07 | 1.4-p3 | 7312 | 439 | 1591 (40) | 734 (20) | 49 | 197
| |
| 2001-06-10 | 1.4-p4 | 7321 | 439 | 1591 (40) | 734 (20) | 49 | 198
| |
| 2001-07-15 | 1.4-p5 | 7228 | 426 | 1596 (40) | 734 (20) | 51 | 198
| |
| 2001-08-23 | 1.5 | 8016 | 475 | 600 | 2654 (39) | 1166 (29) | 63 | 327
|
| 2002-03-05 | 1.6 | 8465 | 475 | 1136 | 2732 (39) | 1603 (27) | 66 | 365
|
| 2002-04-11 | 1.6.1 | 8544 | 475 | 1136 | 2741 (39) | 1603 (27) | 66 | 372
|
| 2002-06-14 | 1.6.2 | 8575 | 475 | 1136 | 2800 (39) | 1609 (27) | 67 | 386
|
| 2002-07-28 | 1.6.3 | 8600 | 475 | 1153 | 2809 (39) | 1609 (27) | 67 | 391
|
| 2002-07-28 | 1.4-p6 | 7332 | 455 | 1596 (40) | 735 (20) | 49 | 197
| |
| 2002-09-25 | 1.7 | 9189 | 471 | 1790 | 2965 (39) | 1606 (28) | 73 | 430
|
| 2002-10-16 | 1.7.1 | 9229 | 475 | 1790 | 2977 (39) | 1606 (28) | 73 | 437
|
| 2002-12-06 | 1.7.2 | 9334 | 475 | 1790 | 2988 (39) | 1606 (28) | 77 | 445
|
| 2003-02-20 | 1.7.3 | 9389 | 475 | 1790 | 3023 (39) | 1651 (29) | 84 | 448
|
| 2003-04-23 | 1.7.4 | 9429 | 475 | 1790 | 3031 (39) | 1644 (29) | 85 | 458
|
| 2003-05-18 | 1.7.5 | 9429 | 475 | 1790 | 3033 (39) | 1645 (29) | 85 | 459
|
| 2003-07-10 | 1.7.6 | 9442 | 475 | 1790 | 3033 (39) | 1660 (29) | 85 | 461
|
| 2003-09-07 | 1.7.7 | 9443 | 475 | 1790 | 3041 (39) | 1660 (29) | 90 | 467
|
| 2003-10-07 | 1.7.8 | 9444 | 475 | 1790 | 3041 (39) | 1660 (29) | 90 | 468
|
| 2003-11-09 | 1.7.9 | 9444 | 475 | 1790 | 3048 (39) | 1660 (29) | 90 | 468
|
| 2003-12-10 | 1.8 | 7171 | 585 | 7730 | 3236 (39) | 1666 (31) | 104 | 521
|
| 2004-01-11 | 1.8.1 | 7217 | 663 | 7726 | 3287 (39) | 1686 (31) | 104 | 525
|
| 2004-01-12 | 1.8.2 | 7217 | 663 | 7726 | 3288 (39) | 1686 (31) | 104 | 526
|
| 2004-03-07 | 1.8.3 | 7214 | 686 | 7735 | 3303 (39) | 1695 (31) | 111 | 530
|
| 2004-04-25 | 1.8.4 | 7214 | 686 | 7736 | 3310 (39) | 1701 (31) | 112 | 531
|
| 2004-05-16 | 1.8.5 | 7240 | 686 | 7736 | 3299 (39) | 1701 (31) | 112 | 533
|
| 2004-07-28 | 1.9 | 7508 | 715 | 7794 | 3352 (40) | 1812 (32) | 115 | 551
|
| 2004-08-11 | 1.9.1 | 7512 | 715 | 7794 | 3354 (40) | 1812 (32) | 115 | 552
|
| 2004-09-19 | 1.9.2 | 7512 | 715 | 7794 | 3354 (40) | 1812 (32) | 132 | 554
|
| 2004-11-01 | 1.9.3 | 7507 | 718 | 7804 | 3354 (40) | 1812 (32) | 134 | 556
|
| 2004-12-18 | 1.9.4 | 7508 | 718 | 7856 | 3361 (40) | 1811 (32) | 140 | 560
|
| 2005-02-13 | 1.9.5 | 7523 | 719 | 7859 | 3373 (40) | 1453 (32) | 142 | 562
|
| 2005-07-10 | 1.9.6 | 7539 | 699 | 7867 | 3400 (40) | 1453 (32) | 144 | 570
|
| 2006-10-15 | 1.10 | 7859 | 1072 | 8024 | 3512 (40) | 1496 (34) | 172 | 604
|
| 2008-01-19 | 1.10.1 | 7870 | 1089 | 8025 | 3520 (40) | 1499 (34) | 173 | 617
|
| 2008-11-23 | 1.10.2 | 7882 | 1089 | 8027 | 3540 (40) | 1509 (34) | 176 | 628
|
| 2009-05-17 | 1.11 | 8721 | 1092 | 8289 | 4164 (42) | 1714 (37) | 181 | 732 (20)
|
Copyright © 2000, 2001, 2002, 2007, 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
http://fsf.org/
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
The purpose of this License is to make a manual, textbook, or other functional and useful document free in the sense of freedom: to assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and redistribute it, with or without modifying it, either commercially or noncommercially. Secondarily, this License preserves for the author and publisher a way to get credit for their work, while not being considered responsible for modifications made by others.
This License is a kind of “copyleft”, which means that derivative works of the document must themselves be free in the same sense. It complements the GNU General Public License, which is a copyleft license designed for free software.
We have designed this License in order to use it for manuals for free software, because free software needs free documentation: a free program should come with manuals providing the same freedoms that the software does. But this License is not limited to software manuals; it can be used for any textual work, regardless of subject matter or whether it is published as a printed book. We recommend this License principally for works whose purpose is instruction or reference.
This License applies to any manual or other work, in any medium, that contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it can be distributed under the terms of this License. Such a notice grants a world-wide, royalty-free license, unlimited in duration, to use that work under the conditions stated herein. The “Document”, below, refers to any such manual or work. Any member of the public is a licensee, and is addressed as “you”. You accept the license if you copy, modify or distribute the work in a way requiring permission under copyright law.
A “Modified Version” of the Document means any work containing the Document or a portion of it, either copied verbatim, or with modifications and/or translated into another language.
A “Secondary Section” is a named appendix or a front-matter section of the Document that deals exclusively with the relationship of the publishers or authors of the Document to the Document's overall subject (or to related matters) and contains nothing that could fall directly within that overall subject. (Thus, if the Document is in part a textbook of mathematics, a Secondary Section may not explain any mathematics.) The relationship could be a matter of historical connection with the subject or with related matters, or of legal, commercial, philosophical, ethical or political position regarding them.
The “Invariant Sections” are certain Secondary Sections whose titles are designated, as being those of Invariant Sections, in the notice that says that the Document is released under this License. If a section does not fit the above definition of Secondary then it is not allowed to be designated as Invariant. The Document may contain zero Invariant Sections. If the Document does not identify any Invariant Sections then there are none.
The “Cover Texts” are certain short passages of text that are listed, as Front-Cover Texts or Back-Cover Texts, in the notice that says that the Document is released under this License. A Front-Cover Text may be at most 5 words, and a Back-Cover Text may be at most 25 words.
A “Transparent” copy of the Document means a machine-readable copy, represented in a format whose specification is available to the general public, that is suitable for revising the document straightforwardly with generic text editors or (for images composed of pixels) generic paint programs or (for drawings) some widely available drawing editor, and that is suitable for input to text formatters or for automatic translation to a variety of formats suitable for input to text formatters. A copy made in an otherwise Transparent file format whose markup, or absence of markup, has been arranged to thwart or discourage subsequent modification by readers is not Transparent. An image format is not Transparent if used for any substantial amount of text. A copy that is not “Transparent” is called “Opaque”.
Examples of suitable formats for Transparent copies include plain ascii without markup, Texinfo input format, LaTeX input format, SGML or XML using a publicly available DTD, and standard-conforming simple HTML, PostScript or PDF designed for human modification. Examples of transparent image formats include PNG, XCF and JPG. Opaque formats include proprietary formats that can be read and edited only by proprietary word processors, SGML or XML for which the DTD and/or processing tools are not generally available, and the machine-generated HTML, PostScript or PDF produced by some word processors for output purposes only.
The “Title Page” means, for a printed book, the title page itself, plus such following pages as are needed to hold, legibly, the material this License requires to appear in the title page. For works in formats which do not have any title page as such, “Title Page” means the text near the most prominent appearance of the work's title, preceding the beginning of the body of the text.
The “publisher” means any person or entity that distributes copies of the Document to the public.
A section “Entitled XYZ” means a named subunit of the Document whose title either is precisely XYZ or contains XYZ in parentheses following text that translates XYZ in another language. (Here XYZ stands for a specific section name mentioned below, such as “Acknowledgements”, “Dedications”, “Endorsements”, or “History”.) To “Preserve the Title” of such a section when you modify the Document means that it remains a section “Entitled XYZ” according to this definition.
The Document may include Warranty Disclaimers next to the notice which states that this License applies to the Document. These Warranty Disclaimers are considered to be included by reference in this License, but only as regards disclaiming warranties: any other implication that these Warranty Disclaimers may have is void and has no effect on the meaning of this License.
You may copy and distribute the Document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that this License, the copyright notices, and the license notice saying this License applies to the Document are reproduced in all copies, and that you add no other conditions whatsoever to those of this License. You may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the copies you make or distribute. However, you may accept compensation in exchange for copies. If you distribute a large enough number of copies you must also follow the conditions in section 3.
You may also lend copies, under the same conditions stated above, and you may publicly display copies.
If you publish printed copies (or copies in media that commonly have printed covers) of the Document, numbering more than 100, and the Document's license notice requires Cover Texts, you must enclose the copies in covers that carry, clearly and legibly, all these Cover Texts: Front-Cover Texts on the front cover, and Back-Cover Texts on the back cover. Both covers must also clearly and legibly identify you as the publisher of these copies. The front cover must present the full title with all words of the title equally prominent and visible. You may add other material on the covers in addition. Copying with changes limited to the covers, as long as they preserve the title of the Document and satisfy these conditions, can be treated as verbatim copying in other respects.
If the required texts for either cover are too voluminous to fit legibly, you should put the first ones listed (as many as fit reasonably) on the actual cover, and continue the rest onto adjacent pages.
If you publish or distribute Opaque copies of the Document numbering more than 100, you must either include a machine-readable Transparent copy along with each Opaque copy, or state in or with each Opaque copy a computer-network location from which the general network-using public has access to download using public-standard network protocols a complete Transparent copy of the Document, free of added material. If you use the latter option, you must take reasonably prudent steps, when you begin distribution of Opaque copies in quantity, to ensure that this Transparent copy will remain thus accessible at the stated location until at least one year after the last time you distribute an Opaque copy (directly or through your agents or retailers) of that edition to the public.
It is requested, but not required, that you contact the authors of the Document well before redistributing any large number of copies, to give them a chance to provide you with an updated version of the Document.
You may copy and distribute a Modified Version of the Document under the conditions of sections 2 and 3 above, provided that you release the Modified Version under precisely this License, with the Modified Version filling the role of the Document, thus licensing distribution and modification of the Modified Version to whoever possesses a copy of it. In addition, you must do these things in the Modified Version:
If the Modified Version includes new front-matter sections or appendices that qualify as Secondary Sections and contain no material copied from the Document, you may at your option designate some or all of these sections as invariant. To do this, add their titles to the list of Invariant Sections in the Modified Version's license notice. These titles must be distinct from any other section titles.
You may add a section Entitled “Endorsements”, provided it contains nothing but endorsements of your Modified Version by various parties—for example, statements of peer review or that the text has been approved by an organization as the authoritative definition of a standard.
You may add a passage of up to five words as a Front-Cover Text, and a passage of up to 25 words as a Back-Cover Text, to the end of the list of Cover Texts in the Modified Version. Only one passage of Front-Cover Text and one of Back-Cover Text may be added by (or through arrangements made by) any one entity. If the Document already includes a cover text for the same cover, previously added by you or by arrangement made by the same entity you are acting on behalf of, you may not add another; but you may replace the old one, on explicit permission from the previous publisher that added the old one.
The author(s) and publisher(s) of the Document do not by this License give permission to use their names for publicity for or to assert or imply endorsement of any Modified Version.
You may combine the Document with other documents released under this License, under the terms defined in section 4 above for modified versions, provided that you include in the combination all of the Invariant Sections of all of the original documents, unmodified, and list them all as Invariant Sections of your combined work in its license notice, and that you preserve all their Warranty Disclaimers.
The combined work need only contain one copy of this License, and multiple identical Invariant Sections may be replaced with a single copy. If there are multiple Invariant Sections with the same name but different contents, make the title of each such section unique by adding at the end of it, in parentheses, the name of the original author or publisher of that section if known, or else a unique number. Make the same adjustment to the section titles in the list of Invariant Sections in the license notice of the combined work.
In the combination, you must combine any sections Entitled “History” in the various original documents, forming one section Entitled “History”; likewise combine any sections Entitled “Acknowledgements”, and any sections Entitled “Dedications”. You must delete all sections Entitled “Endorsements.”
You may make a collection consisting of the Document and other documents released under this License, and replace the individual copies of this License in the various documents with a single copy that is included in the collection, provided that you follow the rules of this License for verbatim copying of each of the documents in all other respects.
You may extract a single document from such a collection, and distribute it individually under this License, provided you insert a copy of this License into the extracted document, and follow this License in all other respects regarding verbatim copying of that document.
A compilation of the Document or its derivatives with other separate and independent documents or works, in or on a volume of a storage or distribution medium, is called an “aggregate” if the copyright resulting from the compilation is not used to limit the legal rights of the compilation's users beyond what the individual works permit. When the Document is included in an aggregate, this License does not apply to the other works in the aggregate which are not themselves derivative works of the Document.
If the Cover Text requirement of section 3 is applicable to these copies of the Document, then if the Document is less than one half of the entire aggregate, the Document's Cover Texts may be placed on covers that bracket the Document within the aggregate, or the electronic equivalent of covers if the Document is in electronic form. Otherwise they must appear on printed covers that bracket the whole aggregate.
Translation is considered a kind of modification, so you may distribute translations of the Document under the terms of section 4. Replacing Invariant Sections with translations requires special permission from their copyright holders, but you may include translations of some or all Invariant Sections in addition to the original versions of these Invariant Sections. You may include a translation of this License, and all the license notices in the Document, and any Warranty Disclaimers, provided that you also include the original English version of this License and the original versions of those notices and disclaimers. In case of a disagreement between the translation and the original version of this License or a notice or disclaimer, the original version will prevail.
If a section in the Document is Entitled “Acknowledgements”, “Dedications”, or “History”, the requirement (section 4) to Preserve its Title (section 1) will typically require changing the actual title.
You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Document except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute it is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License.
However, if you cease all violation of this License, then your license from a particular copyright holder is reinstated (a) provisionally, unless and until the copyright holder explicitly and finally terminates your license, and (b) permanently, if the copyright holder fails to notify you of the violation by some reasonable means prior to 60 days after the cessation.
Moreover, your license from a particular copyright holder is reinstated permanently if the copyright holder notifies you of the violation by some reasonable means, this is the first time you have received notice of violation of this License (for any work) from that copyright holder, and you cure the violation prior to 30 days after your receipt of the notice.
Termination of your rights under this section does not terminate the licenses of parties who have received copies or rights from you under this License. If your rights have been terminated and not permanently reinstated, receipt of a copy of some or all of the same material does not give you any rights to use it.
The Free Software Foundation may publish new, revised versions of the GNU Free Documentation License from time to time. Such new versions will be similar in spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems or concerns. See http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/.
Each version of the License is given a distinguishing version number. If the Document specifies that a particular numbered version of this License “or any later version” applies to it, you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that specified version or of any later version that has been published (not as a draft) by the Free Software Foundation. If the Document does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published (not as a draft) by the Free Software Foundation. If the Document specifies that a proxy can decide which future versions of this License can be used, that proxy's public statement of acceptance of a version permanently authorizes you to choose that version for the Document.
“Massive Multiauthor Collaboration Site” (or “MMC Site”) means any World Wide Web server that publishes copyrightable works and also provides prominent facilities for anybody to edit those works. A public wiki that anybody can edit is an example of such a server. A “Massive Multiauthor Collaboration” (or “MMC”) contained in the site means any set of copyrightable works thus published on the MMC site.
“CC-BY-SA” means the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 license published by Creative Commons Corporation, a not-for-profit corporation with a principal place of business in San Francisco, California, as well as future copyleft versions of that license published by that same organization.
“Incorporate” means to publish or republish a Document, in whole or in part, as part of another Document.
An MMC is “eligible for relicensing” if it is licensed under this License, and if all works that were first published under this License somewhere other than this MMC, and subsequently incorporated in whole or in part into the MMC, (1) had no cover texts or invariant sections, and (2) were thus incorporated prior to November 1, 2008.
The operator of an MMC Site may republish an MMC contained in the site under CC-BY-SA on the same site at any time before August 1, 2009, provided the MMC is eligible for relicensing.
To use this License in a document you have written, include a copy of the License in the document and put the following copyright and license notices just after the title page:
Copyright (C) year your name.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3
or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover
Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled ``GNU
Free Documentation License''.
If you have Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts and Back-Cover Texts, replace the “with...Texts.” line with this:
with the Invariant Sections being list their titles, with
the Front-Cover Texts being list, and with the Back-Cover Texts
being list.
If you have Invariant Sections without Cover Texts, or some other combination of the three, merge those two alternatives to suit the situation.
If your document contains nontrivial examples of program code, we recommend releasing these examples in parallel under your choice of free software license, such as the GNU General Public License, to permit their use in free software.